« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

March 27, 2008

Breaking News: Elle Macpherson Signs On As Global Face of Revlon Brand

Elle1First, the news: Elle Macpherson, (photo, right) the 44-year old Tasmanian-born supermodel best known for her glossy appearances on the covers of Elle and Sports Illustrated, as well as her numerous engagements as the face of Victoria's Secret, has been tapped as the "global brand ambassador" for Revlon.

She'll join the current roster of the cosmetic firm's brand faces, which include actresses Halle Berry, Jessica Alba, and Beau Garrett, in a move that the company says "continues the long-standing tradition [Revlon] started of partnering with the most beautiful and iconic women of the time to represent the brand."

She'll be featured in upcoming global campaigns, none of which have been revealed, and will also be involved in the company's various sponsored philanthropic activities.

Now, the air kisses between Revlon prez and CEO David Kennedy and Ms. Macpherson:

"Elle's special qualities as a businesswoman, beautiful and talented model, actress and mother represent the essence of the Revlon brand," said Kennedy in a statement.

"Revlon is an iconic brand, bringing high quality products to women around the world and is complementary to my values," said Macpherson, also in a statement. "I am proud to join Revlon in its celebration of women and in its long term commitment and support for education and research to advance women's health and particularly, to fight women's cancers."

Alright, yadda yadda yadda. But what does this mean?

First of all, they're not saying it, but we have to think that there's at least two things going on here.

First is a cheap purchase of a marketable name that's a little past it's prime. Think about it: what's the last hot campaign, like big big spend campaign, that you can remember featuring Elle Macpherson? Still scratching your head? Question answered. She prolly came pretty cheap, which isn't a bad thing when marketing budgets at even the biggest spenders look like they're getting crunched. (For more on that, check out our regular news story, here.) But do you remember the name Elle Macpherson? Yeah, we thought you might. Bingo!

SIDE THEORY: One of our friends thinks Elle might actually be the face of the brand's anti-aging product line, dubbed "Age Defying," which has featured celebs including Melanie Griffith, and Julianne Moore, in the past. Revlon hasn't yet revealed exactly which campaigns Elle will be appearing in, just that they'll be global.

Second, it would seem, is a play at attracting the older consumer set, the ladies about our mom's age, maybe a little younger or a little older, who probably remember idolizing Macpherson when she was hot, and they were also her age. Like Elle, they're around 44 years old, and want to feel that you can still be glamorous at any age. And from a sales perspective, it makes sense if you consider that the size of the boomer generation.

Breaking News: Reebok Names New CMO

Picture_2Less than a month after former Reebok CMO Uli Becker took over as the brand's president and CEO, the top marketing spot has been filled at the Canton, Mass.-based athletic company.

And, much to our surprise, it's from someone inside Reebok and not an Adi ex-patriot, like Mr. Becker was.

The new CMO will be Matt O’Toole, former (and brief) President of Reebok North America, pictured, below, left. He gets most of his accolades (via Becker) for the work he did in growing the business at the Reebok-CCM Hockey division, where he had been president and CEO, prior to assuming his Reebok NA duties.

In his new role, O’Toole will lead the brand’s global marketing efforts, including product and design, sports marketing, brand marketing, and public relations. In addition to those duties, he will continue to direct the hockey business.

And now, the lovefest from Becker.

“Matt was appointed to lead our U.S. organization on the strength of his exceptional track-record in building Reebok-CCM Hockey’s brand and business, as well as his outstanding strategic marketing expertise,” said Becker, in a statement. “These are the skills that make him a natural choice for the role of CMO. In his short time as president of Reebok North America, Matt made a huge impact on the brand, leading our restructuring efforts for the U.S. market.”

Picture_3 Taking over O’Toole’s old post, will be Jim Gabel, who has been tapped as President of Reebok North America. Gabel was formerly svp at Adidas America, where he managed the U.S. Adidas brand business as well as its TaylorMade and Adidas Golf Canada divisions.

O’Toole will be officially installed April 1, with Gabel’s appointment effective mid-April.

It's not news that the brand is in troubling times. In an earnings statement released earlier this month by adidas, Reebok, which reports in euros, posted sales of $3.55 billion (at current exchange rates) for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, down 6% from the year earlier.

The company slashed its advertising budget nearly in half last year, spending only $17 million on measured media, excluding online, for 2007, per Nielsen Monitor-Plus. That's down from $28 million in 2006. Maybe they'll pump the tank back to "Full" this year.

Here's hoping that the new team will be able to turn things around.

And now, in case you've missed it, a brief recap of stuff Reebok's been cooking up:

-Forthcoming, casual athletic-themed "Your Move" campaign, that we saw last year.
-A new line of Kool-Aid scented footwear.
-Oh yeah, and that "Freestyle World Tour" collection that's supposed to appeal to chicks across the globe. 

Lessons in Branding: Why Going Logo-less Might Be A Good Idea For Luxury Brands During The Recession

Picture_1_2There's an interesting  article today in the New York Times' "Thursday
Styles" section.

No, no, read on! It's not another critique of an out-of-touch story on youth trends or pandering pitch about how great the rich are and why we, the not-so-rich should thank our lucky stars they exist. Our friends over at Marx Marvelous have that end covered pretty well.

Rather, today, we're calling out a piece about the absence of logos on Bottega Veneta's luxury sportswear.

The piece, which can be read in full here, looks at how the Italian luxury label has revamped itself without going the route of high-profile monogramming or logoing.

Within the article, journo Ruth La Ferla, extolls the virtues of creative director Tomas Maier's consistent attention to high quality goods that hit the real deal in luxury, rather than merely the perception of luxury, and how his actions have driven the brand to a $500 million annual business, thereby making it the second highest earner for parent Gucci Group.

And then our favorite luxurist, Milton Pedraza, CEO of The Luxury Institute, chimes in to tell La Ferla that during a recession, the rich "don’t want to be screaming luxury right now...They don’t want something flashy that everybody else has. They are looking for unique handcrafted things that can’t immediately be reinterpreted at every level of the marketplace.”

The thing about logos, as we've long felt, is that they can cut both ways. In fact, we've been thinking about our own logo, for Fashion Notebook, which you can check out, at right, but the tech guys haven't yet gotten around to installing it. And maybe, now, we're thinking that's a good thing.

But back to the relevance.

Taking Vuitton, for example, when one of perhaps mass-affluent or aspirational means has laid down the dollars for a fashion piece that is truly of excellent quality, not to mention name recognition, it's, we think, safe to assume that we'd like others to know it. After all, that monogram tells others that we care about quality, perhaps that  we're hip to hot or established names in the industry, and, let's be honest, that we could afford to purchase it. In a sense, we want everyone else to know what that handbag, dress, or accessory was worth, and, by proxy, that we're worth something as well.

The problem, of course, is logos also tell us what everyone else is worth, too. And if we see a bunch of Louis Vuitton monograms on my friends' purses, or luggage, shoes, or, god help us, something bigger and obviously more expensive than the piece we bought, suddenly, Vuitton just doesn't seem so special anymore.

This is to ignore the further complications that arise from knock-offs. If everyone on Canal Street is rocking the monogram, and for a mere percentage point of what we paid, why we'd have a fit and would feel somewhat obligated to inform everyone we saw that, well, no, ours is in fact, real and then go into a litany about the stitching and leather quality that, at best, wouldn't gain us any friends, and, at worst, would lose us those we already count in our ranks.

And let's not forget that this isn't, obviously, just a Vuitton problem. Many other luxury brands feature highly-identifiable logos, monograms, or signature patterns on their products that identify the brand with all the subtlety of a bull horn. Think about those brands you recognize within seconds on some of the products worn by your friends: Coach, Gucci, Burberry, Chanel, Marc Jacobs, Dolce & Gabanna, DSquared, etc. 

As far as the recession, the no-logo route is probably a good idea. After all, those who can afford luxury goods without batting an eye are usually so acclimated to that lifestyle that, well, they don't need to scream it, as Milton says, like the rest of us. And those customers are precisely the ones luxury brands need to be going after in times of serious economic downturns. Sound familiar? Yeah, we've said that before.

And we've also dished with Maier on his strategy. When we were writing that tome about the opportunities and potential pitfalls of lower-tier secondary collections for high-end designers, it was Maier who said (towards the end of the article) he would never consider such an extension because he felt that it would potentially overexposure of the handbag business that is the core of Bottega's sales.

"The philosophy of Bottega Veneta is to produce innovative designs with the highest quality materials and contemporary functionality," Maier told us at the time. "All of this comes with a cost that can't be recreated at a bridge level price."

What remains to be seen, however, is whether or not Mr. Maier's activities give the brand something of a glass ceiling when we're in economic boom times, and everyone is scrambling for top-end designer merchandise. Then again, at $500 million in annual sales, I don't think he's got anything to worry about.

March 18, 2008

UPDATE: No Calvin TV Campaign For Eva Mendes

Picture_2So we had some questions regarding that Eva Mendes story we posted yesterday.

Turns out that there won't be a TV push for the launch of "Seductive Comfort." Rather, it will be a global print and outdoor campaign, just like the stuff she'll be doing for the Fall 2008 skivvies ads, and we imagine that will likely also be the plan for the forthcoming fall fragrance launch.

Also, no color, so to speak, on Eva's ability to appeal to the Hispanic shopper demographic. A rep told us that Eva was picked for her "universal appeal" and general hotness. Sometimes, we guess, there is no angle when a company picks a mass-culture celebrity.

March 17, 2008

Breaking News: Eva Mendes Will Be the Face of Calvin Klein Underwear for Fall 2008 Campaign

Eva_mendes_dot_com842Calvin Klein announced today that it has tapped Eva Mendes (pictured, right) for its forthcoming Fall 2008 underwear campaign.

The actress, best known for her performances in Ghost Rider, Hitch, and Training Day, will appear in the global print and outdoor campaign, and will be used to help launch the brand's "Seductive Comfort" line. She will also be the face of a new Calvin Klein fragrance that also launches this fall. Details concerning the
fragrance were not available, but if the campaign's anything like the one for ckIN2u, then don't hold your breath. We thought the creative looked like a sex-sells job that was phoned in from the brand's edgier heritage, though we will say the mobile marketing for that launch, in Canada at least, was noteworthy and inventive.

The deal, the terms of which were not revealed, builds on a longstanding relationship between the actress and the brand. Mendes has appeared in Calvin Klein Collection gowns at various events including the CFDA Fashion Awards, Condé Nast's celeb-heavy "Fashion Rocks" parties, and most recently, last month's Independent Spirit Awards.

Here's the lovefest quote from CK prez and COO Tom Murry:

"We're very pleased that Calvin Klein will be able to capitalize on the benefits of having a beautiful and talented actress like Eva Mendes featured in two campaigns running this fall," he said, in a statement."She really embodies the essence of the Calvin Klein brand and we look forward to seeing that carried through in the creative."

We're trying to figure out if the brand will use Mendes to leverage market share with Hispanic consumers, as well as whether or not "Seductive Comfort" will feature TV spots as part of its launch push. Check back later for more details.

March 13, 2008

Lessons in Branding: Why Isn't Missoni Playing Up Green Aspect of Collector's Edition "Aqua" Bottle?

Picture_1_2We talk a lot about "green" these days, so much so that we have to be careful that we're not misusing the buzzword, and that we suss out the veracity of its usage in the numerous releases that  come across our desk each day.

But today, in a notice about a new collector's bottle for Missoni's land- mark "Missoni Acqua" fragrance, we also have to watch out for when we don't see the term used when it could so readily apply.

The bottle, which Angela Missoni sez was inspired by "the colors and textures of the Missoni scarf," is meant to be a  collector's bottle that will "bring a touch of color to every woman's day."

OK, well, wee see those inspirations, the multi-hued tassle and the iconic zig-zags cut into the metal ball that adorns the atomizer cap. The bottle is rather classic looking, if not bowling us over with design, and we could definitely see it fitting easily and comfortably on a vanity table, in a purse, or in checked luggage (mind those ounces, ladies!).

But what seems to be downplayed here is that, as a collector's bottle that the customer would allegedly wish to keep around longer than the life of the liquid fragrance it contains, the thing is refillable.  Which means of course less waste given that consumers would actually go to get the bottle refilled rather than just buying a new box.

This is the stuff of green people! The kind of thing that marketers everywhere are desperate to communicate about their brand. So why isn't Missoni doing it? Well, perhaps it's because they don't want to invite further scrutiny of the rest of their line, which likely isn't comprised of eco-friendly materials or manufacturing processes. After all, there is definitely a movement to have more investigation on green claims these days and who wants to be investigated by consumer advocacy groups pining for a bloody production story or a disproof of claims?

(Disclaimer: We don't actually know how Missoni operates its factories, but are operating under the assumption that the luxury Italian brand, like most other high-end labels, can't really operate in the green production world, at least not just yet.)

Anyhow, we feel this is a missed opportunity. Check out this latest Top of Mind from our print sister, Brandweek's, Robert Klara, a funny riff on green initiatives that actually save companies money and, more importantly, help build some good will with consumers.

March 12, 2008

What the 2008 CFDA Nominations Tell Us About American Fashion

Another spring, another awards season for the Council of Fashion Designers of America. We always look forward to this announcement, and yet we always walk away from the press release disappointed. Why? Well, because year after year, it all just feels the same and it's gotten to the point where we feel we could pick out the nominees, blindfolded and drunk, and probably get them right about 90% of the time. But first, the nominees.

In case you haven't heard, the group, whose prez is none other than that lullaby-talking Diane Von Furstenberg, has announced the following nominations for 2008: [Note: The Swarovski awards recognize emerging design talent.]

Womenswear Designer of the Year                                   Swarovski Award for Womenswear
Francisco Costa (Calvin Klein)                                            Kate & Laura Mulleavy (Rodarte)
Lazaro Hernandez & Jack McCollough (Proenza Schouler)     Thakoon Panichgul (Thakoon)
Marc Jacobs                                                                      Alexander Wang

Menswear Designer of the Year                                        Swarovski Award for Menswear
Thom Browne                                                                   Patrik Ervell
Michael Bastian                                                                Tim Hamilton
Tom Ford                                                                         Scott Sternberg (Band of Outsiders)

Accessory Designer of the Year                                        Swarovski Award for Accessory Design   Tory Burch                                                                       Philip Crangi
Marc Jacobs                                                                      Justin Giunta (Subversive Jewelry)
Michael Kors                                                                     Joy Gryson

Well, congratulations to all the winners. Then again, we're sure they've heard it all before. Actually, they have. Let's take a quick, two-year trip down memory lane, just with the marquee awards.

CFDA Nominees 2007                                                     CFDA Nominees 2006     

Womenswear:                                                                  Womenswear:
Oscar de  la Renta                                                            Francisco Costa (Calvin Klein)
L. Hernandez and J. McCollough (Proenza Schouler)            L. Hernandez and J. McCollough (PS)
Marc Jacobs                                                                     Marc Jacobs

Menswear:                                                                       Menswear:
Steven Cox and Daniel Silver (Duckie Brown)                      Thom Browne
Ralph Lauren                                                                    Ralph Lauren
Italo Zucchelli (Calvin Klein)                                              Alexandre Plokhov (Cloak)

Accessory Designer of the Year:                                          Accessory Designer of the Year:
Marc Jacobs                                                                      Marc Jacobs    
Michael Kors                                                                     Michael Kors
Derek Lam                                                                        Tom Binns

Andysblog_kors_320x240_2
Notice anything? Like maybe the fact that the nominees in the
womenswear category have remained virtually unchanged (with the
exception of Oscar de la Renta) for the past three years? Or that Michael Kors (pictured, right, doing his Project Runway duties) and Marc Jacobs have been the accessory designer of the year nominees for three years running, as well? The only thing that seems to have changed much at all is the men's category.

In his statement regarding this year's nominees, CFDA executive director Steven Kolb lauds the way in which "this year's nominees and honorees reflect the strength and vitality of the American fashion industry."

Really? It seems to us that it suggests the industry is rather stagnant, with only the same three names worthy of distinction in each of the categories. And let's not forget that chief among those names, Mr. Marc Jacobs, seemed poised, only a season ago, to take his whole operation to Paris. But we digress.

In essence, it would seem that the CFDA nominations this year, and as we've demonstrated above, the past several years, prove that American fashion is a pretty rarified echelon in which only a standard round of top names compete for industry prizes. For an industry where the bread and butter is creativity, the stagnancy (why does that word keep coming to us?) of the nominations list seems to imply a less thoughtful approach. That said, if asked which designers we thought were tops in American design, we'd be hard pressed to come up with a different list. Perhaps the fault then, dear readers, is not within the CFDA nominating committee but within our American fashion selves.

It's hard for American designers—hell, for ANY designers—to become established like these award winners anymore, given the difficulties of getting funding and the fact that we live in a world that no longer seems to care about the development of talent as much as they do about constantly having something new, something chic, and something with a name that others will recognize. To that end, CFDA (and Vogue) are to be commended for their work to bring notoriety to new design labels, as they have with Proenza Schouler, who now top the ranks of their regular awards, having graduated from the Swarovski Award for Womenswear. But it's hard to see any kind of sea change in American fashion coming—and perhaps no one wants it—given that these guys are always at the top of the list for women's design.

Here's hoping that maybe Christian Siriano, recent Project Runway winner (whom we can't help ourselves but to shill for), will liven up those ranks in the coming years.

And full disclaimer: This post is not a statement, by Fashion Notebook, that we think any of the nominated designers aren't talented, or are not worthy of awards. Rather, it is a statement that we've seen these same people getting awards and nominations for years, and we're wondering why there's no one else in the American fashion ring worthy of such distinction by the CFDA.

Week in Review Pt. 2: In Which Gap Rethinks Marketing Spend, Reebok's CMO Moves Into the Driver's Seat, and Airwalk Taps MySpace Celebrities

Sorry_we_havent_talked_in_a_whileOnce again, we're sorry that we've been silent for so long! But we've been writing a lot for that dying industry: the print book. Hey, you gotta eat!

Anyhow, here's a brief recap of our stories from last week, and this week, along with that snarky commentary that you guys seem to love. So here's a few things that you might have missed.

And now... back to the recap. (We promise some new stories very, very soon!)




Gap Brand Forgoes Spring TV Spot, Amid Tightening Following Rough Quarter

After Gap reported fourth quarter sales of $4.67 billion, a 5% drop from last year, the company had some interesting news on the marketing front.

The company is actively looking to trim costs as it weathers a “volatile economic environment,” said CEO Glenn Murphy, in a conference call to analysts on Feb. 28.

Gap The struggling retailer will reexamine its marketing plans for the second half of 2008, once it has a better understanding of its holiday efforts, said Murphy. “We’re very aware of the environment in which we’re operating in 2008, but not all of our marketing money is being revisited," he said. "Some portion is being re-looked at to make sure it’s being used appropriately, given that consumer sentiment is where it is, and that particularly applies at Old Navy.”

The immediate marketing plans for Old Navy and Banana Republic would remain similar in scope to last year’s, while the company has decided to forgo a spring TV campaign for the Gap brand, said evp/CFO Sabrina Simmons.

The primary focus of spring marketing for the namesake division will be print and in-store efforts for the retailer’s footwear collaboration with designer Pierre Hardy, due out in March. Additionally, Gap will launch a capsule T-shirt collection, a design collaboration with the Council of Fashion Designers of America, which will hit retail stores in April.

Hmm... Doesn't sound good. And add that to the fact that, according to Nielsen Monitor-Plus, Gap already cut its ad spend in half for last year, spending an estimated $55 million (down from $117 million in 2006), per Nielsen Monitor-Plus. Old Navy spent an estimated $173 million on U.S. ads in 2007, down slightly from $200 million in 2006.

For the full story, click here.


Reebok CMO Uli Becker Moves Into the Driver's Seat as Prez/CEO Harrington Exits

Uli Becker got a jump last week, when the Reebok CMO was named president and CEO of the ailing brand, following the resignation (forced?) of top dog Paul Harrington, who had been with the company for 12 years.

This is actually something of a growing trend across industries, one that we've been keeping track of. In fact, wouldn't you know, we wrote something about it today. Check out that story, about CMOs migrating to the CEO and presidential roles, here.
539w
Back to the relevance, Becker (photo, left) joined Reebok back in May 2006, following his duties as the head of global brand marketing for Adidas (Reebok's parent company) and managing director of Adidas International in Amsterdam. When he joined Reebok, Becker announced his intent to streamline marketing operations and to unify brand messaging, as the athletic footwear and apparel maker sought to turn its business around and reposition itself in the marketplace.

We like him. He's a straight shooting guy who's looking to get all of those mixed messages cleaned up and get the brand on the track to profitability, all with the kind of efficiency you'd expect from a German executive. So we expect good things, hopefully, and, it would appear, so does Adidas jefe principal Herbert Hainer.

"[Paul Harrington] played an instrumental role in managing the integration of Reebok into our group and laid the foundations for the repositioning of the Reebok brand worldwide," said Hainer, chairman and CEO of Adidas, in a statement. "Uli Becker's proven leadership and global marketing expertise make him uniquely qualified to take the revitalization of the Reebok brand to the next level, both internationally and in the US."

Reebok's marketing for 2008 would be focused on women's running and "American major league sports," underscored in the brand's forthcoming "Your Move" campaign, said Hainer. The campaign, previewed last year, aims to cast Reebok as the brand for individuals rather than hardcore athletes and is part of a larger effort for Reebok to capture the sport lifestyle market.

Details regarding a CMO replacement were not available.

McGarryBowen, New York, is the lead ad agency for Reebok. The company's latest ad campaign launched two weeks ago in conjunction with the release of its first "Freestyle World Tour" collection (but, of course, our readers already knew about that). The product line will include five new sneaker and apparel editions, which will roll out during the course of this year. "Freestyle Tokyo," which launched Feb. 21, will be followed by other editions that derive their name and design inspiration from cities like Paris, London, and New York.

For the full story, click here. For all of our Reebok-related posts, check here


Airwalk Looks at MySpace for Brand ModelsLorene_drive_pink_motel
In its spring 2008 campaign, which hits a variety of alterna- lifestyle titles in June (and it's not the 1990s anymore honey, so we're not talking about gay pubs, but rather the skate/surf/
snowboard glossies), Airwalk went to MySpace for part of its casting call.

In addition to leveraging images of its athletes, including Rodney Jones, the brand cast Lorene Drive, a band that creative director Jeff Buice found on MySpace, to be featured in their ads (check outtake spot, right). Even more interesting is that the ads feature mini-anecdotes from the talent, and directs readers to log onto Airwalk.com to see the full story, and then write in some stories of their own.

Buice told me that the idea is basically to make a social network around ad campaign creative. Yeah, it made us do a double take too. But Airwalk has been on the online game for sometime now, and this is just the latest way that they're engaging with the online market.

"We always do print ads because it still reaches tons of the demo that we’re going after. But the online component is growing massively, out of control, for our [consumers]," Buice told me. "The hook was finding a way to get people to correlate between the two, while still maintaining a focused, singular strategy."

Intrigued? Check out the full story, here

Week in Review Pt. 1: Louis Vuitton Rocks Out, Kohl's Gets Punked, and More Rumbles for the Luxury Market

Picture_1OK, so we've kinda been bad lovers the past two weeks. Yeah, we admit it;
we haven't been updating as often as we, or you, would like. But our offline
job got a bit crazed last week and that prevented us from posting. So, in effect, it's not you, it's us.

Also, we were, like, on pins and needles waiting for the finale of Project Runway. And, hopefully you'll agree, we're so, so, so, fiercely happy that Christian Siriano won we can barely contain ourselves. Kid has some serious talent, and we're sure that we'll be hearing from him sometime soon. Is he adoptable  by the way? We might just forego that Boston Terrier we'd been planning on bringing home and swap it for that adorable pocket-gay (though he'll have to sleep in a closet, as we're still living in a New York state of reality folks!).

But let's leave all this relationship drama to the Spitzers! It's time to take a look at what's happened, what it means, and where we see things going... So without further ado...

Louis Vuitton's New Bag
Unless you've been hiding out under a mountain of paperwork (like us), you've probably already heard that Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards is the new, wrinkly face of Louis Vuitton (SEE PHOTO, BELOW, LEFT). (Insert "Vuitton's new, iconic wrinkled bag" joke here, hell, everyone else has. For SHAME Saturday Night Live! You, like fashion, were more inventive in the 1980s.) If you haven't seen the spot already, check the photo at right.

Keith_2We have to say to say that this is an interesting choice, and it's already done its job many times over in terms of exposure (more than we'd imagine placing, say, Katherine Heigl, or some other, safer choice, in front of the camera). But hasn't Vuitton really missed the rebel-rock-me boat by like, say, 40 years? We would prefer to see the ads featuring this Keith.

Also, how does John Varvatos feel about all of this. Certainly, the Stones trump Cheap Trick, not to mention the fact that the campaign pretty much cribs from Varvatos' own advertising mantra: Bring back old rockers and consumers will come. Of  course, Varvatos seems to have more credibility here and we're still not sure what a great cover boy Richards is for the brand. After all, while he's definitely rich beyond words—and amazingly still alive—we're just not sold on him as a real luxury guy. Then again, maybe that's what rehab and old age will do to you. I'm sure that he has a wonderful assortment of organic teas backstage, but is he really throwing those outfits in a Vuitton steamer?

Love to hear your thoughts on this. Drop us a line, here.

Kohls Pumps Up Its Juniors Jam with Avril LavigneAvrillavigne
Yeah, the girl ain't punk kids. Then again, Richards sold his ass to Louis Vuitton, so what does define the legitimate rocker persona? Anyways, Avril Lavigne maybe didn't steal your boyfriend, but she did ink a deal with Kohl's to produce "Abbey Dawn," a collection of apparel (priced $24 to $48) and accessories (read: jewelry, for now) that will hit the mass merchant's doors nationwide in July.

The move obviously means that Lavigne will get some dollars in her coffers—seriously, is she even that hot anymore?—but it also seems to really define her audience in a way that could be limiting for the popstar. Launching just in time for back-to-school shopping, the line is allegedly for the "broad group of shoppers" that Lavigne attracts, according to SVP Don Brennan, but we're calling bullshit. If it's B-T-S, the tricks are for kids, and that's fine, after all, those are the types that will pay retail for her album "The Best Damn Thing," which came out last year and for which the star began touring to support last week.

According to spokeswoman Vicki Shamian, the line shouldn't cannibalize any of the retailer's other exclusive brands, like Candies given Avril (and by proxy, her collection's) "feminine yet rock n' roll attitude." [Side note: Meanwhile, no notes on how the Simply Vera collection is doing. If you've got deets, or reactions, or if you've tried on the products, send a note here]. Advertising, on which details aren't yet available, will be handled by the Kohl's in-house team, in conjunction with lead agency McCann Erickson, New York. Stayed tuned.

 


Financial Desk: Luxury Retail's Mixed Bag

Ok, so we've probably hammered this to death, but there might be trouble with the luxury market.

Saks Fifth Avenue announced last week that it had approached roughly $1 billion in sales for the quarter ended Feb. 2, up almost 5% from the year-earlier period, but with comp store sales increasing by 9%. Meanwhile, net income rose dramatically, some 83% drama, to $39.5 million, or 26 cents a diluted share. However, gross margin slipped about 50 basis points to 37.4% of sales.

Saks_bags But there's trouble ahead. According to a statement by chairman and CEO Steven Sadove, January and February comp store sales grew by only 4.1% and 3.4%, respectively, and "previously high-growth rate businesses such as handbags, footwear and men's have slowed."

"As expected, the more challenging promotional and overall macroeconomic environment that we began to experience in the third quarter continued throughout the fourth quarter and put pressure on our merchandise margins," Sadove continued. "Our outsized comparable store sales growth indicates that we significantly improved our competitive positioning by market, driven by our merchandise, service marketing and capital investments."

And then  came the wahn-wahn moment.

"Nothwithstanding our improved performance and the longer-term outlook for the luxury channel, we expect to continue to face an increasingly challenging macroeconomic and promotional environment in 2008, and are taking a more conservative approach to planning the business this year," Sadove said, adding that the company expects to see comp store sales growth in the mid-single digits for 2008, with low-to-mid single digit growth in the first half of the year.

Meanwhile, at Neiman Marcus, positive earnings were also overcast by ominous notes. Revenues at the luxury department store grew almost 6% to $1.37 billion in the second quarter ended Jan. 26, while net earnings grew 8% to $44.3 million. However, February comp stores sales posted a 7.3% decrease.

In a conference call, Neiman Marcus chairman and CEO Burt Tansky seemed to feel, well, pretty much like every other luxury retailer these days. He's playing a cautious game as the news of a buckling economy and decreased consumer spending prophecies an even rougher year.

"As we all know, the entire U.S. retail sector has seen sales growth diminish somewhat, and this slowdown has affected some parts of the luxury market," he said in the call. "Our sense is that the aspirational customer has pulled back somewhat in response to concerns about the U.S. economy in stock and housing markets. However, this aspirational customer appreciates quality and can be expected to buy more as the economy improves. Nevertheless, we feel confident that the pure luxury customer, the affluent to the very affluent, will continue to demand only the finest."

Seems plausible, of course, except that we're not getting at raw numbers here. What's the proportion of aspirational consumers to pure luxury consumers? Wethinks it be disproportionate and that Neiman's might have a few, hopefully not too many, pricey dresses that are staying on the racks as Sex and the City fangirls start closing up their upper-middle class purses.

Categories

Powered by TypePad